Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Transp Geogr. 2018 Nov 21;74:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009

Table 1:

Selected sociodemographic and economic characteristics of neighborhoods with above- and below- median bike share availability during a 6-month pilot in Seattle, WA in 2017 (n=93 neighborhoods)

Characteristic Frequency of Characteristic,
Median % (IQR)
Low Bike
Availabilitya
High Bike
Availabilityb
Population Densityc 3049 (2246, 3704) 3190 (2153, 4256)
Over Age 60 18 (15, 22) 18 (15, 21)
Non-Hispanic White 67 (54, 78) 71 (54, 81)
Non-Hispanic Black 6 (2, 12) 2 (1, 10)
Non-Hispanic Asian 11 (7, 15) 12 (8, 19)
Any Hispanic 6 (5, 8) 5 (4, 7)
Diversity Indexd 53 (38, 65) 48 (33, 64)
Income < $20,000 13 (8, 18) 10 (6, 16)
Income > $100,000 35 (27, 47) 41 (33, 48)
Income > $200,000 8 (5, 13) 12 (8, 20)
Median Household 71 296 83 202
Income (USD$) (60 659, 92 561) (67 589, 100 338)
High School Degree 96 (90, 97) 97 (90, 98)
College Degree 65 (55, 72) 75 (61, 81)
Displacement Riske 14 (7, 18) 9 (7, 17)
Access to Opportunitye 19 (15, 23) 25 (20, 29)
a

Below median number average of bikes available per resident

b

Above median number average of bikes available per resident

c

Median residents/km2

d

USAToday Diversity Index (CITE) . Range 0–100, where higher is more diverse

e

Displacement Risk and Access to Opportunity from Seattle’s comprehensive plan (13). Higher scores on the displacement risk index indicate higher risk of displacement. Higher scores on access to opportunity indicate greater access to resources.