Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Sep 3;27(10):1661–1670. doi: 10.1002/oby.22592

Table 5:

Associations of BMI z-score with standing height, trunk and leg length, and pubertal development at 12.9 years in Project Viva

BMI z-score β (95% CI)a OR (95% CI)a,b

Standing height (cm) Trunk length (cm) Leg length (cm) Pubertal score (units) Pubic hair stage
Boys (n=758)
  Birth 0.09 (−0.69,0.88) 0.21 (−0.26,0.69) −0.12 (−0.62,0.38) −0.02 (−0.09,0.06) 1.03 (0.83,1.27)
  6.3m 0.32 (−0.27,0.92) 0.34 (−0.02,0.70) −0.01 (−0.39,0.36) 0.03 (−0.02,0.09) 1.11 (0.93,1.32)
  3.2y 0.88 (0.10,1.67)c 0.77 (0.31,1.22) 0.12 (−0.39,0.63) 0.01 (−0.05,0.08) 0.93 (0.75,1.16)
  7.7y 1.62 (0.84,2.40) 0.71 (0.24,1.19) 0.91 (0.39,1.42) 0.11 (0.05,0.18) 1.49 (1.19,1.87)
  12.9y 0.91 (−0.01,1.82) 1.17 (0.63,1.71) −0.27 (−0.85,0.32) 0.12 (0.04,0.20) 1.37 (1.04,1.79)
Girls (n=732)
  Birth 0.03 (−0.72,0.79) −0.05 (−0.51,0.42) 0.08 (−0.39,0.55) −0.02 (−0.09,0.04) 1.05 (0.84,1.31)
  6.3m 0.31 (−0.25,0.87) 0.41 (0.05,0.77) −0.10 (−0.47,0.27) 0.05 (−0.01,0.10) 1.28 (1.05,1.56)
  3.2y 0.59 (−0.14,1.31) 0.72 (0.27,1.17) −0.13 (−0.59,0.32) 0.05 (−0.01,0.12) 1.09 (0.86,1.37)
  7.7y 1.14 (0.43,1.85) 0.88 (0.44,1.32) 0.26 (−0.20,0.72) 0.17 (0.10,0.24) 1.60 (1.26,2.03)
  12.9y 1.43 (0.60,2.27) 1.50 (0.98,2.03) −0.07 (−0.60,0.46) 0.30 (0.23,0.38) 1.84 (1.38,2.45)
a

Adjusted for maternal and paternal education level, height and BMI; maternal age, smoking history and parity; gestational age at delivery; breastfeeding initiation; child ethnicity; BMI z-score at all previous time points and age at outcome.

b

OR (odds ratio) reflects relative odds of being in a higher Tanner stage category.

c

Bold values indicate statistically significant associations at p<0.05.