Table 3.
Mixed-Domain Impairment | ES | Memory-Specific Impairment | ES | Frontal Impairment | ES | Superior Cognition | ES | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aAmyloid, % | 1.68 (−0.3 – 3.7), 0.095 | 0.37 | 1.11 (0.3 – 2.0), 0.010 | 0.25 | −0.07 (−1.1 – 1.0), 0.903 | 0.02 | −1.3 (−2.6 – 0.5), 0.059 | 0.30 |
aTau, mm2 | 9.1 (5.9 – 12.3), <0.001 | 1.27 | 3.75 (2.4 – 5.1), <0.001 | 0.53 | 0.63 (−1.1 – 2.4), 0.478 | 0.11 | −1.04 (−3.2 – 1.2), 0.356 | 0.17 |
bGlobal burden of AD pathology low vs very low | 0.86 (0.49 – 1.51), 0.594 | −0.07 | 1.15 (0.96 – 1.38), 0.129 | 0.08 | 1.04 (0.8 – 1.3), 0.750 | 0.02 | 0.58 (0.37 – 0.92), 0.019 | −0.22 |
bGlobal burden of AD pathology medium/high vs. very low | 3.22 (1.7 – 6.0), <0.01 | 0.36 | 2.46 (1.55 – 3.90), <0.001 | 0.25 | 1.28 (0.6 – 2.6), 0.485 | 0.06 | 0.90 (0.37 – 2.20), 0.816 | −0.02 |
bTDP-43 cytoplasmic inclusions localized to amygdala vs. none | 0.74 (0.2 – 2.5), 0.621 | −0.10 | 0.91 (0.6 – 1.3), 0.606 | −0.08 | 0.72 (0.4 – 1.2), 0.186 | 0.18 | 0.47 (0.2–1.0), 0.048 | 0.16 |
bTDP-43. cytoplasmic inclusions extended to hippocampus and/or entorhinal cortex vs. none | 1.89 (1.1 – 3.1), 0.013 | 0.27 | 0.95 (0.7 – 1.4), 0.807 | −0.15 | 0.97 (0.6 – 1.5), 0.876 | 0.14 | 0.52 (0.2 – 1.1), 0.096 | 0.43 |
bTDP-43 cytoplasmic inclusions extended to neocortex vs. none | 2.69 (1.4 – 5.2), 0.001 | 0.31 | 1.74 (1.14 – 2.7), 0.010 | 0.16 | 0.80 (0.4 – 1.6), 0.536 | 0.14 | 0.73 (0.3 – 1.7), 0.477 | 0.36 |
bHippocampal sclerosis | 3.02 (1.2 – 7.4), 0.016 | −0.11 | 2.02 (1.09 – 3.74), 0.026 | 0.09 | 0.91 (0.37 – 2.22), 0.828 | −0.54 | 0.54 (0.13 – 2.28), 0.405 | −0.07 |
bLewy Bodies vs. none | 2.07 (1.2 – 3.6), 0.011 | 0.32 | 1.42 (1.01 – 1.2), 0.041 | −0.31 | 1.08 (0.7 – 1.7), 0.748 | −0.80 | 1.03 (0.57 – 1.9), 0.921 | 0.01 |
Note. Results show postmortem indices of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disease pathologies included in the analyses. “Average class” is the control in all models. ES = Effect Size. TDP-43 = transactive response DNA-binding protein 43.
indicates continuous variables: The odds ratios are given; Hedge’s g is computed for effect size.
indicates categorical variables: The relative risk ratios are given, and effect size is calculated using Cohen’s h for binary variables.