Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Aug;14(4):1089–1107. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00075-x

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the adolescent study group: N=subject count; Mean ± SD (range)

Boys Girls df p
N 87 91 1
Age 16±2.34 15.67±2.19 176 .332
Site (UCSD/SRI) 69/18 65/26 .223a
PDS1 2.93±0.7 3.34±0.65 176 .0001
Parent SES 92.06±16.05 90.36±15.15 171 .476
Parent Years of Education 16.76±2.98 16.8±2.46 175 .92
WRAT2
 Reading 115.86±16.387 112.97±15.882 176 .233
 Math 115.63±15.611 113.32±16.015 176 .331
Stroop Match-to-Sample task
 Mean response time (ms) 568.29±96.66 628.66±129.61 176 .001
 Median response time (ms) 544.776±93.82 604.56±125.94 176 .001
Stroop conflict: RTINC − RTCON (ms) 14.88±25.44 12.08±24.79 176 .458
 Stroop for RR 20.82±31.26 15.62±35.81 176 .305
 Stroop for RS 6.18±40.13 −0.8±38.21 176 .236
Response switching: RTRS − RTRR (ms) 3.84±25.96 3.35±30.35 176 .909
 RR for con (no conflict) 12.53±39.77 16.23±38.14 176 .528
 RS for inc (conflict) −4.86±38.58 −9.53±43.81 176 .452
1

Pubertal Development Score (PDS): score ranges between 1=puberty not started and 4=puberty completed;

2

Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT): Standard scores are reported with an expected mean±SD of 100±15;

a

Chi-square test

Abbreviations: df: degrees of freedom; p: p-value of statistical significance; SES: socioeconomic status; RS: response switching; RR: response repetition; inc: incongruent; con: congruent; RT: response time; ms: milliseconds.

Note: Despite same average ages of boys and girls, boys had lower pubertal development scores (PDS) than the girls. Age and PDS were more strongly correlated in boys than girls (age/PDS: boys r=0.81, girls r=.639, z=−2.43, p=0.0151). Boys scored lower on TIPI conscientiousness and higher on TIPI emotional stability than girls, the latter being associated with higher PDS scores in the male (r=.236, p=0.028), but not the female (r=−.172, p=0.102) (z=2.72, p=0.0065) group.