Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 27;20(10):1431–1440. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0212

Table 2. CCCs between Different Slice Thicknesses before and after SR Application.

RF Classes 1 mm vs. 3 mm 1 mm vs. 5 mm 3 mm vs. 5 mm
Original SR P Original SR P Original SR P
Total
 Shape 0.93 ± 0.06 0.86 ± 0.12 0.92 ± 0.09
 Tumor intensity 0.75 ± 0.17 0.97 ± 0.05 < 0.001 0.60 ± 0.21 0.92 ± 0.11 < 0.001 0.90 ± 0.06 0.96 ± 0.05 < 0.001
 Texture 0.62 ± 0.19 0.84 ± 0.15 < 0.001* 0.42 ± 0.18 0.72 ± 0.19 < 0.001 0.76 ± 0.16 0.88 ± 0.13 < 0.001*
 Wavelet 0.38 ± 0.22 0.54 ± 0.37 < 0.001* 0.25 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.34 < 0.001 0.63 ± 0.22 0.71 ± 0.21 < 0.001*
 Tumor intensity + texture + wavelet 0.41 ± 0.23 0.58 ± 0.37 < 0.001* 0.27 ± 0.21 0.45 ± 0.34 < 0.001* 0.65 ± 0.22 0.72 ± 0.21 < 0.001*
GGN
 Shape 0.91 ± 0.08 0.83 ± 0.15 0.88 ± 0.15
 Tumor intensity 0.79 ± 0.17 0.97 ± 0.05 < 0.001* 0.68 ± 0.19 0.89 ± 0.11 < 0.001* 0.91 ± 0.17 0.93 ± 0.05 0.303*
 Texture 0.63 ± 0.23 0.80 ± 0.20 < 0.001 0.44 ± 0.22 0.66 ± 0.21 < 0.001* 0.74 ± 0.19 0.82 ± 0.17 0.001*
 Wavelet 0.39 ± 0.23 0.54 ± 0.38 < 0.001* 0.26 ± 0.21 0.40 ± 0.33 < 0.001* 0.63 ± 0.22 0.67 ± 0.23 < 0.001*
 Tumor intensity + texture + wavelet 0.42 ± 0.25 0.56 ± 0.37 < 0.001* 0.29 ± 0.22 0.44 ± 0.34 < 0.001* 0.65 ± 0.22 0.69 ± 0.23 < 0.001*
Solid
 Shape 0.94 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.10 0.95 ± 0.05
 Tumor intensity 0.58 ± 0.19 0.92 ± 0.19 < 0.001 0.40 ± 0.19 0.87 ± 0.22 < 0.001 0.83 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.09 < 0.001
 Texture 0.51 ± 0.19 0.82 ± 0.15 < 0.001* 0.31 ± 0.16 0.68 ± 0.22 < 0.001 0.71 ± 0.14 0.87 ± 0.13 < 0.001
 Wavelet 0.35 ± 0.23 0.53 ± 0.36 < 0.001* 0.22 ± 0.20 0.41 ± 0.34 < 0.001* 0.59 ± 0.26 0.71 ± 0.23 < 0.001*
 Tumor intensity + texture + wavelet 0.37 ± 0.23 0.57 ± 0.36 < 0.001* 0.24 ± 0.20 0.44 ± 0.34 < 0.001* 0.60 ± 0.25 0.73 ± 0.23 < 0.001*

*p values are derived from paired t test or Wilcoxon test. CCC = concordance correlation coefficient, RF = radiomic feature, SR = super-resolution