Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;48(8):2367–2379. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlations among SE sexting, social–cognitive factors, and outcome variables (n = 91)

Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. SE sexting frequency 0.64 0.69 1 .50** .23* − .00 .48** .17 − .21* − .34** .39** − .07
2. SE definitions 2.65 1.19 1 .58** .37** .70** .22** − .04 − .32** .49** − .01
3. SE differential association (peers) 2.01 0.78 1 .50** .43** .17* − .07 − .21** .33** .03
4. SE differential association (parents) 1.37 0.51 1 .19** − .02 − .14* − .23** .21** .11
5. SE differential reinforcement 2.71 0.97 1 .18* .01 − .31** .52** − .03
6. Imitation (friends) 1.94 0.75 1 .37** − .10 .10 .12
7. Imitation (famous) 2.40 0.83 1 .09 − .01 .07
8. Perceived risk of risky sexual behavior 5.27 1.29 1 − .51** − .15*
9. Perceived benefit of risky sexual behavior 2.17 1.07 1 − .01
10. Sexual satisfaction 2.97 0.58 1

*p < .05, **p < .01