Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;48(8):2367–2379. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlations among RP sexting, social–cognitive factors, and outcome variables (n = 153)

Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. RP sexting frequency 0.82 0.68 1 .33** .08 .03 .36** .40** .23** − .09 .08 .11 .08
2. RP definitions 4.28 0.87 1 .50** .14* .72** .37** .22** − .19** .29** .19** − .11
3. RP differential association (peers) 3.00 0.48 1 19** .37** .38** .22** − .08 .13 .09 − .04
4. RP differential association (parents) 1.86 0.65 1 .11 .07 .01 − .08 .12 .11 .03
5. RP differential reinforcement 3.63 0.92 1 .28** .20** − .12 .28** .18** − .16*
6. Imitation (friends) 1.94 0.75 1 .37** − .10 .10 .12 .07
7. Imitation (famous) 2.40 0.83 1 .09 − .01 .07 .09
8. Perceived risk of risky Sexual behavior 5.27 1.29 1 − .51** − .15** .11
9. Perceived benefit of risky sexual behavior 2.17 1.07 1 − .01 − .20
10. Sexual satisfaction 2.97 0.58 1 .32**
11. Relationship satisfaction 3.73 0.68 1

*p < .05, **p < .01