Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;48(8):2367–2379. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w

Table 5.

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis predicting SE sexting frequency with SE definitions, SE reinforcement, and SE differential association (peers) (n = 91)

R2 ∆R2 Fchange Rchange2 β 95% CI
LL UL
Step 1 .04 .04 4.43* .05
Gender .22* .02 .54
Step 2 .29 .26 9.57** .24
Gender .01 − .22 .29
SE definitions .33* .05 .40
SE reinforcement .26 − .01 .42
SE differential association (peers) − .16 − .27 .12
Imitation (famous) − .22 − .30 .06

*p < .05, **p < .01