. 2019 Sep 9;48(8):2367–2379. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w

Table 6.

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis predicting RP sexting frequency with RP definitions, RP reinforcement, imitation (friends), and imitation (famous), controlling for age (n = 153)

	R²	∆R²	F_change	$R_{change}^{2}$	β	95% CI
	R²	∆R²	F_change	$R_{change}^{2}$	β	LL	UL
Step 1	.08*	.07	6.52	.08
Age					− .25*	− .04	− .009
Gender					.10	− .08	.34
Step 2	.27**	.24	9.16	.18
Age					− .12	− .03	.002
Gender					.04	− .14	.26
RP definitions					.10	− .08	.30
RP reinforcement					.19*	.01	.32
Imitation (friends)					.26*	.10	.39
Imitation (famous)					.11	− .03	.21

*p < .05, **p < .01