Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;2019(9):CD011055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011055.pub2

Chompook 2006 THA.

Methods Case‐control study (matched)
Participants Cases: attended health facility with diarrhoea and shigella isolated from rectal swab, n = 139 (after 53 not enrolled: not resident, not found, moved away, died, or time‐constraints), median age 5 years, 57% girls.
Controls: individuals free from diarrhoea or dysentery during the 4 weeks prior to recruitment, matched for sex and age with the cases (within 3 months for children aged < 2 years; within 6 months for children aged < 5 years; within 12 months for children aged < 16 years old; and within 5 years for people aged ≥ 16 years), randomly selected from the population list of the HC where the case resided. n = 264 (after 7 moved and 2 refused), median age 5 years, 58% girls.
Interventions Risk factors of interest:
  • children not/sometimes using latrine vs always using latrine;

  • child excreta disposal method (no data presented).

Outcomes Diarrhoea (≥ 3 loose stools, or ≥ 1 watery, bloody, or mucoid stool in the 24 hours prior to visiting the health facility) with isolated Shigella
Notes Location: semi‐urban, Kaengkhoi District, Saraburi Province, Thailand
Length of recruitment: 2 years surveillance for Shigella (2000–2002)
Publication status: journal and PhD thesis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk NA
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk NA
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk NA
Other bias Unclear risk NA
Similarity of baseline outcome measurements Unclear risk NA
Similarity of baseline characteristics Unclear risk NA
Adequate allocation of intervention concealment during the study Unclear risk NA
Adequate protection against contamination Unclear risk NA
Confounders adequately adjusted for in analysis/design Unclear risk NA
Recruitment bias Unclear risk NA
Baseline imbalance Unclear risk NA
Loss of clusters Unclear risk NA
Incorrect analysis Unclear risk NA