Cummings 2012 UGA.

Methods	Case‐control study (unmatched)
Participants	Cases: people aged > 10 years who met the UMOH's outbreak case definition admitted to a cholera treatment centre in Moroto during April–June 2010; and resided in 1/15 selected villages in Nadunget, n = 99, median age 26 years, 64.6% female. Controls: people aged > 10 years who had not experienced any form of diarrhoea from April 2010 to the time of investigation, resided in 1/15 selected villages in Nadunget, n = 99, median age 33 years, 51.5% female.
Interventions	Risk factor of interest: not disposing of child faeces in latrine vs using latrine to dispose of faeces (unclear what the age of the children whose faeces were disposed, referred to as younger children in the HH).
Outcomes	Cholera: acute watery diarrhoea in an area with laboratory‐confirmed cholera cases
Notes	Location: rural Karamoja subregion, north‐east Uganda Length of recruitment: 3 months (April–June 2010) Publication status: journal
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	NA
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	NA
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	NA
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	NA
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	NA
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	NA
Other bias	Unclear risk	NA
Similarity of baseline outcome measurements	Unclear risk	NA
Similarity of baseline characteristics	Unclear risk	NA
Adequate allocation of intervention concealment during the study	Unclear risk	NA
Adequate protection against contamination	Unclear risk	NA
Confounders adequately adjusted for in analysis/design	Unclear risk	NA
Recruitment bias	Unclear risk	NA
Baseline imbalance	Unclear risk	NA
Loss of clusters	Unclear risk	NA
Incorrect analysis	Unclear risk	NA