Ghosh 1994 IND.
Methods | Case‐control study (nested in a community longitudinal study following up of children aged < 3 years with twice a week active surveillance for diarrhoea) | |
Participants | Cases: families with a child aged < 3 years with diarrhoea, n = 105 (initially 76 but 29 controls developed diarrhoea and became a case). Controls: families with an age‐matched child aged < 3 years without diarrhoea in neighbourhood, n = 47 (initially 76 but 29 controls developed diarrhoea and became a case). |
|
Interventions | Risk factor of interest:
|
|
Outcomes | Diarrhoea (no case definition), data collected twice per week | |
Notes | Location: rural West Bengal, India Length of recruitment: 12 months Publication status: journal |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | NA |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | NA |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NA |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NA |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NA |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | NA |
Other bias | Unclear risk | NA |
Similarity of baseline outcome measurements | Unclear risk | NA |
Similarity of baseline characteristics | Unclear risk | NA |
Adequate allocation of intervention concealment during the study | Unclear risk | NA |
Adequate protection against contamination | Unclear risk | NA |
Confounders adequately adjusted for in analysis/design | Unclear risk | NA |
Recruitment bias | Unclear risk | NA |
Baseline imbalance | Unclear risk | NA |
Loss of clusters | Unclear risk | NA |
Incorrect analysis | Unclear risk | NA |