Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;2019(9):CD011055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011055.pub2

Ghosh 1994 IND.

Methods Case‐control study (nested in a community longitudinal study following up of children aged < 3 years with twice a week active surveillance for diarrhoea)
Participants Cases: families with a child aged < 3 years with diarrhoea, n = 105 (initially 76 but 29 controls developed diarrhoea and became a case).
Controls: families with an age‐matched child aged < 3 years without diarrhoea in neighbourhood, n = 47 (initially 76 but 29 controls developed diarrhoea and became a case).
Interventions Risk factor of interest:
  • indiscriminate child stool disposal (no definition of indiscriminate).

Outcomes Diarrhoea (no case definition), data collected twice per week
Notes Location: rural West Bengal, India
Length of recruitment: 12 months
Publication status: journal
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk NA
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk NA
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NA
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk NA
Other bias Unclear risk NA
Similarity of baseline outcome measurements Unclear risk NA
Similarity of baseline characteristics Unclear risk NA
Adequate allocation of intervention concealment during the study Unclear risk NA
Adequate protection against contamination Unclear risk NA
Confounders adequately adjusted for in analysis/design Unclear risk NA
Recruitment bias Unclear risk NA
Baseline imbalance Unclear risk NA
Loss of clusters Unclear risk NA
Incorrect analysis Unclear risk NA