Mathew 2004 ZIM.
Methods | Controlled cross‐sectional study | |
Participants | Number: 115 respondents Inclusion criteria: no details |
|
Interventions | Intervention (2 villages): CHCs: structured weekly course of participatory health education classes. 15 health topics covered using PHAST techniques, within the hygiene lesson cover disposal of toddler's faeces in a latrine. Control (2 villages): no CHCs |
|
Outcomes | Knowledge of risks and practices including: percentage of children aged < 5 years present at the time of observations not using a latrine. | |
Notes | Location: 4 rural villages, Bikita district, Zimbabwe Length of study: not specified Publication status: PhD thesis |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Intervention not randomly allocated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Allocation not concealed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NA |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | NA |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Non‐response data not reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Tool for observations not available. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | — |
Similarity of baseline outcome measurements | Unclear risk | NA, not relevant to design. |
Similarity of baseline characteristics | Unclear risk | NA, not relevant to design. |
Adequate allocation of intervention concealment during the study | High risk | No blinding. |
Adequate protection against contamination | Unclear risk | No details about distance or possibility for contamination. |
Confounders adequately adjusted for in analysis/design | High risk | No adjustments for any confounders. |
Recruitment bias | Unclear risk | NA |
Baseline imbalance | Unclear risk | NA |
Loss of clusters | Unclear risk | NA |
Incorrect analysis | Unclear risk | NA |