Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;17:178. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1408-4

Table 2.

Associations between metabolites (continuous) and risk of breast cancer, for metabolites with raw P values < 0.05

Class Metabolite Odds ratio and 95% CI (for 1 SD)a Raw P value Permutation-based minP P valueb Bonferroni P valuec False discovery rate P valued
Amino acids Arginine 0.89 (0.80–0.99) 0.035 0.753 1.000 0.166
Asparagine 0.87 (0.80–0.95) 0.002 0.109 0.240 0.062
Glutamine 0.91 (0.84–0.99) 0.031 0.731 1.000 0.166
Glycine 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.005 0.229 0.629 0.090
Histidine 0.91 (0.84–0.99) 0.020 0.588 1.000 0.131
Lysine 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 0.010 0.389 1.000 0.102
Threonine 0.92 (0.85–0.99) 0.034 0.752 1.000 0.166
Acylcarnitines C14:1 1.09 (1.01–1.18) 0.028 0.704 1.000 0.166
C18:1 1.11 (1.00–1.22) 0.040 0.793 1.000 0.183
C2 1.15 (1.06–1.24) 0.0004 0.031 0.051 0.036
Glycerophospholipids PC aa C32:3 0.90 (0.82–0.99) 0.026 0.674 1.000 0.166
PC aa C36:2 0.89 (0.82–0.97) 0.009 0.339 1.000 0.099
PC aa C36:3 0.89 (0.82–0.96) 0.002 0.117 0.272 0.062
PC aa C38:3 0.92 (0.85–0.99) 0.035 0.753 1.000 0.166
PC ae C34:2 0.90 (0.84–0.97) 0.008 0.317 0.966 0.099
PC ae C36:2 0.90 (0.84–0.98) 0.009 0.339 1.000 0.099
PC ae C36:3 0.88 (0.82–0.95) 0.001 0.044 0.073 0.036
PC ae C38:2 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 0.002 0.128 0.310 0.062
PC ae C38:3 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 0.012 0.425 1.000 0.107
PC ae C38:5 0.93 (0.86–1.00) 0.047 0.836 1.000 0.205
PC ae C40:1 0.92 (0.84–0.99) 0.030 0.730 1.000 0.166
PC ae C40:4 0.91 (0.84–0.98) 0.018 0.553 1.000 0.129
PC ae C42:1 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 0.010 0.393 1.000 0.102
lysoPC a C18:0 0.88 (0.80–0.98) 0.014 0.473 1.000 0.115
lysoPC a C18:2 0.89 (0.81–0.96) 0.004 0.209 0.559 0.090
lysoPC a C20:3 0.90 (0.83–0.98) 0.013 0.434 1.000 0.107
Sphingolipids SM C20:2 0.90 (0.82–0.98) 0.018 0.546 1.000 0.129
SM (OH) C22:1 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.008 0.322 1.000 0.099
Sugars Hexose 1.12 (1.01–1.24) 0.035 0.752 1.000 0.166

SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval

Italicized text indicates a statistically significant association with breast cancer risk after adjustment of P values by permutation-based minP

aOdds ratios were estimated by logistic regression conditioned on center of recruitment, age, menopausal status at the time of blood collection, phase of the menstrual cycle at blood collection (for premenopausal women only), use of exogenous hormone at blood collection, time of the day at blood collection, and fasting status at blood collection

bMultiple testing controlled for family-wise error rate at α = 0.05 by permutation-based stepdown minP adjustment of P values

cMultiple testing controlled for family-wise error rate at α = 0.05 by Bonferroni adjustment of P values

dMultiple testing controlled for false discovery rate at α = 0.05