Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;19:364. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1791-8

Table 3.

Data from the Multiple Regression Analysis detailing the effect of role, gender, age and duration of the relationship on the perceptions of participants (n = 194)

Dependent variables (IMRI subscales) Independent variables of informal mentoring relationship
Intercept Role
0 Protégé (n. 91)
1 Mentor (n. 103)
Gender
0 Male (n. 92)
1 Female (n. 102)
Age
(in years)
LgDur (+ 1 means duration × 10)
b p b sc p b sc p b sc p b sc p
Acceptance 3.42 .001 .399 .24 .012 .355 .18 .008
Counselling 3.45 .001 .393 .23 .011 .020 .25 .007 .438 .22 .001
Friendship 3.03 .001 .489 .27 .003 .262 .15 .028 .515 .25 .001
Parenting 3.54 .001 .027 .29 .003 .349 .15 .036
Psychosocial support 3.61 .001 .368 .17 .019
Role Modelling 3.54 .001 .506 .28 .001
Social 2.64 .001 .343 .15 .039

Note: The table only presents significant effects; the interactions ‘RoleAge’ and ‘RoleLgDur’ resulted non-significant, and were therefore omitted

b: regression coefficient

sc: standard regression coefficient (not defined for the Intercept)

p: two-sided p value of the t-test against b = 0