Table 2.
HED snacks |
SSBs |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Intervention end | Baseline | Intervention end | |
Participants’ desired portion sizea | 1.47 (.28)b | 1.28 (.27)b | .88 (.21)b | .81 (.27)b |
Perceptions of peers’ desired portion sizea | 1.46 (.26)b | 1.34 (.28)b | .85 (.23) | .89 (.25) |
Frequency of consumptionc | 1.58 (.33) | 1.51 (.45) | 2.12 (.78) | 1.98 (.81) |
Likingc | 3.97 (.40) | 3.93 (.33) | 3.77 (.63) | 3.87 (.46) |
Intentionsd | 3.53 (1.03) | 3.88 (.92) | 2.80 (1.02) | 3.18 (.98) |
aFor desired portion size, a value of 1 refers to the recommended portion size for HED snacks and the typical portion for SSBs. A number greater than 1 indicates the ‘desired’ portion size is greater than the recommended portion, and a number smaller than 1 indicates that the ‘desired’ portion size is smaller than the recommended portion.
bIndicates a significant difference between baseline and intervention end.
cFrequency of consumption was measured on a 6-point Likert-style scale from once per month or never to daily. Liking was measured on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly dislike to strongly like.
dIntentions were assessed on a 5-point Likert-style scale from completely disagree to completely agree.
HED: high-energy-dense; SSB: sugar-sweetened beverage.