Sorensen 2015.
Methods | Single‐centre randomised superiority educational trial | |
Participants |
Who: Shift working staff on the labour ward Number: 100 randomised Proportion of eligible staff participating: 249 eligible; 40% participation |
|
Interventions |
Intervention description: In situ multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training simulations Control: Off‐site training Location: Either in the delivery room/theatre or hospital rooms away from patient care location Delivered by: Representatives from the multidisciplinary working committee for the study Length: 1 day Duration: Single intervention |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes: Safety Attitude Questionnaire Results Follow‐up: 4 to 6 weeks postintervention |
|
Population studied |
Description: Staff in the obstetric and anaesthetic departments of University of Copenhagen Number: 100 |
|
Funding Source | Danish Regions Development and Research Foundation, the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, and Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation | |
Study Setting | Obstetrics and gynaecology department of Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerised and undertaken by trials unit |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealed from investigators |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data managers, statisticians, and investigators blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low amount of missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes in protocol reported in trial. |
Other bias | High risk | Possible contamination between intervention and control |