Walker 2014.
Methods | Paired cluster‐randomised trial | |
Participants |
Who: Interprofessional teams at 24 study hospitals Number: 450 physicians and nurses Proportion of eligible staff participating: 6.4 to 31.6% of eligible staff trained, mean participation rate 20.5%. 3228 were eligible. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention description: PRONTO obstetric emergency training, which is largely interactive using a low‐technology hybrid simulator Control: No intervention Location: Unclear Delivered by: PRONTO trainers Length: 24 hours of training; 2 days followed by 1 day Duration: Single intervention |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes: Perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, achievement of strategic planning goals Follow‐up: 3 years |
|
Population studied |
Description: Hospital‐based neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality at the study sites Number: 58,837 deliveries and 641 births observed, deliveries at study sites. |
|
Funding Source | Mexican National Institute of Women (INMUJERES), the State Secretary for Women in the states of Chiapas and Mexico, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Laerdel Foundation | |
Study Setting | 24 community hospitals in Mexico | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | No description of how randomised, and 4 hospitals not randomised. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not discussed |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not discussed, but not possible to blind participants |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not discussed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Original primary and secondary outcomes could not all be reported due to rarity. This was made clear and justified. |
Other bias | High risk | In 2 of the pairs, the local ministry of health selected the intervention hospitals rather than them being randomised. 11 of the original hospitals dropped out for a variety of reasons and were replaced by 11 similar sites. |