Nielsen 2007.
Methods | Cluster‐randomised trial | |
Participants |
Who: All obstetricians, anaesthesiologists, and nurses Number: 1307 Proportion of eligible staff participating: Not reported |
|
Interventions |
Intervention description: Teamwork training curriculum for labour and delivery. After their training, instructors returned to their hospitals to train local staff. They also developed a contingency team within the hospital consisting of experienced practitioners to respond in a co‐ordinated way to obstetric emergencies. Control: No training Location: Instructors were trained away from their hospitals, they trained staff at their hospitals. Delivered by: Clinical staff at intervention hospitals attended instructor training. Length: The instructor training was 3 days; there is no description of the local intervention. Duration: 4‐month training period |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes: Adverse outcome index, registration to provider assessment Follow‐up: 2 months baseline, 4‐month training period, 5‐month post‐implementation period |
|
Population studied |
Description: Pregnant women over 20 weeks gestation admitted to study sites Number: 28,536 women; control: 14,336, intervention: 14,200 |
|
Funding Source | Department of Defense and American Research Institute | |
Study Setting | Labour and delivery units and 15 civilian/military hospitals in USA | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Clear description of how randomisation took place, using random numbers tables and random assignment of alphanumeric labels to each hospital |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Masking to hospital but not whether military or civilian |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not clear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Mentioned but how missing data were dealt with is not discussed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported. |
Other bias | High risk | Contingency team created as part of team‐training intervention. |