Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;2019(9):CD012177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012177.pub2

Nielsen 2007.

Methods Cluster‐randomised trial
Participants Who: All obstetricians, anaesthesiologists, and nurses
Number: 1307
Proportion of eligible staff participating: Not reported
Interventions Intervention description: Teamwork training curriculum for labour and delivery. After their training, instructors returned to their hospitals to train local staff. They also developed a contingency team within the hospital consisting of experienced practitioners to respond in a co‐ordinated way to obstetric emergencies.
Control: No training
Location: Instructors were trained away from their hospitals, they trained staff at their hospitals.
Delivered by: Clinical staff at intervention hospitals attended instructor training.
Length: The instructor training was 3 days; there is no description of the local intervention.
Duration: 4‐month training period
Outcomes Outcomes: Adverse outcome index, registration to provider assessment
Follow‐up: 2 months baseline, 4‐month training period, 5‐month post‐implementation period
Population studied Description: Pregnant women over 20 weeks gestation admitted to study sites
Number: 28,536 women; control: 14,336, intervention: 14,200
Funding Source Department of Defense and American Research Institute
Study Setting Labour and delivery units and 15 civilian/military hospitals in USA
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Clear description of how randomisation took place, using random numbers tables and random assignment of alphanumeric labels to each hospital
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Masking to hospital but not whether military or civilian
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not clear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Mentioned but how missing data were dealt with is not discussed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported.
Other bias High risk Contingency team created as part of team‐training intervention.