Skip to main content
. 2002 Aug 15;22(16):7195–7205. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-07195.2002

Table 2.

Summary of MT+ subdivision results

Subject Hem Ret Ipsi Angle CvP ITS PvA
A.A.B. R + + + + +
L + + +? + +
A.C.H. R + + + + +? +
L + + + + +
A.R.W. R + + + + + +
L + + + + + +
D.J.H. R + + + + + +
L + + + + + +
R.F.D. R + +? +?
L + + +?
Total 10/10 8/10 5/10 8/10 7/10 8/8

Assessment of MT+ subdivision for all subjects. Hem, Hemisphere (R, right; L, left); Ret, distinct retinotopic subregion (putative human MT); Ipsi, distinct ipsilaterally responsive subregion (putative human MST); Angle, clear phase map evident, indicating an orderly retinotopic map of the angular component of the visual field; CvP, central visual field represented ventral and/or posterior to peripheral representation; ITS, MT+ fell primarily within a dorsal/posterior limb of inferior temporal sulcus; PvA, MT was located posterior and/or ventral to MST. + indicates clear presence; +? indicates equivocal evidence; − indicates no clear evidence; blank fields in the PvA column could not be evaluated for two hemispheres because of failure to identify MST in subject R.F.D.