Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):5856–5864. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-05856.2002

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Rescue of cac lethal mutants. Three different crosses were performed to determine the adult viability of each cac lethal mutant and rescued caclethal mutant relative to males carrying a WT X chromosome (percentage viability; see Materials and Methods). +;;UAS-cac1/+ males (Control) served as a reference for WT viability. In the absence of aUAS-cac1 transgene, elav-GAL4 l(1)L1320-3 (L13 20-3) andelav-GAL4 l(1)L13HC129 (L13 HC129) males were never observed, indicating uniform lethality. In contrast, males of the genotypes elav-GAL4 l(1)L1320-3;;UAS-cac1/+ (L13 20-3 Rescue) and elav-GAL4 l(1)L13HC129;;UAS-cac1/+ (L13 HC129 Rescue) were clearly rescued and exhibited viability similar to that of WT controls. The mean percentage viability value obtained from five independent rescue experiments for each genotype (n = 5) is indicated. Viability ofL13 20-3 Rescue and L13 HC129 Rescue males was not significantly different from that of control males (p > 0.05).