Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9581–9594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09581.2002

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 2. — Lack of effects of l-NAME on responses to seaweed extract in n = 8 seawater-treated andn = 8 l-NAME-treated animals.Shaded bars, Treated with l-NAME;open bars, treated with seawater. A, Latency to lift of the head. There was no significant difference between l-NAME- and seawater-treated animals (p = 0.39;t₍₁₄₎ = 0.88). B, Latency to the first bite. There was no significant difference betweenl-NAME- and seawater-treated animals (p = 0.67;t₍₁₄₎ = 0.43). C, Number of bites in 5 min of exposure. There was no significant difference between l-NAME- and seawater-treated animals (p = 0.59;t₍₁₄₎ = 0.55). D, Time to stop responding to the seaweed extract. There was no significant difference between l-NAME- and seawater-treated animals (p = 0.39;t₍₁₄₎ = 0.90). E, Amplitude of each bite elicited by seaweed extract using a four-point scale. There was no significant difference in the relative distribution of the four levels of bite amplitude (p = 0.09; χ²₍₃₎ = 6.42).