Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5777–5788. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05777.2002

Table 3.

Effect of BIC and STY on AS-specific suppression of spontaneous and EAA-evoked spike activity of DSCT neurons

Spontaneous EAA-evoked
W AS RW W AS RW
Control 24.6  ± 3.0 19.4  ± 4.23-150 24.5  ± 3.5 9.2  ± 1.2 3.1  ± 2.03-150 8.9  ± 1.2
% change ↓21.3  ± 10.2% ↓0.7  ± 6.5% ↓66.4  ± 26.6% ↓3.8  ± 10.6%
% of control (100%) (78.7%) (99.3%) (100%) (33.6%) (99.7%)
BIC 28.9  ± 3.7 29.5  ± 4.4 33.2  ± 4.1 12.4  ± 1.9 13.3  ± 2.1 15.1  ± 2.9
% change ↑2.4  ± 7.9% ↑15.1  ± 6.6% ↑7.4  ± 7.4% ↑22.4  ± 16.7%
% of control (100%) (102.4%) (115.1%) (100%) (107.4%) (122.4%)
STY 28.9  ± 2.6 25.5  ± 2.2 30.7  ± 3.1 12.4  ± 1.9 13.7  ± 2.6 12.3  ± 1.5
% change ↓11.8  ± 3.9% ↑6.2  ± 4.4% ↑10.7  ± 13.1% ↓0.7  ± 6.6%
% of control (100%) (88.2%) (106.2%) (100%) (110.7%) (99.3%)

EAA responses were corrected for spontaneous activity (see Materials and Methods). Data from four cells excited by GLU (−90.7 ± 32.2 nA; 10 sec, 20 sec intervals) and three cells excited by AMPA (−70.7 ± 11.0 nA; 6 sec, 60 sec intervals) are combined and data expressed as in Tables 1 and 2. Downward arrows represent percentage of decrease, whereas upward arrows represent a percentage of increase in spike activity. BIC and STY were administered separately in each cell in separate test SCs. AS-specific suppression of spontaneous and EAA-evoked responses measured 21.3 and 66.4%, respectively (

F3-150: p < 0.05; ANOVA). After BIC (29.8 ± 10.4 nA; 15.7 ± 3.0 min), AS-specific suppression of these parameters was abolished. After STY (32.7 ± 18.4 nA; 18.6 ± 9.4 min), neither spontaneous activity nor EAA-evoked spike activity was suppressed during AS (p > 0.05; ANOVA).