Table 1.
Percentage aggregation of Cx- and mock-transfected C6 glioma cells
Percentage of cells in aggregates | Percentage of donor cells transferring dye | Mean number of receiving cells per donor cell | Coupling index | |
---|---|---|---|---|
C6-Cx43 | 72 ± 4 | 49 ± 4 | 14 ± 2 | 7 ± 0.07 |
C6-Cx40 | 65 ± 3 | 55 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 | 5 ± 0.2 |
C6-Cx32 | 54 ± 3* | 89 ± 3 | 21 ± 3 | 18 ± 0.1 |
C6-mock 1 | 15 ± 4* | 13 ± 1.2 | 1.1 = 0.3 | 0.14 ± 0.04* |
C6-mock 2 | 13 ± 3* | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.01 ± 0.005* |
C6-mock 3 | 10 ± 4* | 18 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.1* |
C6-WT | 18 ± 3* | 27 ± 2 | 3 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2* |
Quantitative analysis of short-term aggregation assays. This table lists the percentage of Cx- and mock-transfected C6 cells that form aggregates in suspension assay. Dye transfer assays ofGoldberg et al. (1995) were used as described in Materials and Methods. All assays were performed in a minimum of three independent runs (range, 3–16; mean, 9).
, Significantly different from C6-Cx43 cells (p < 0.05). ANOVA for group comparison with post hoc t test is used to establish significant difference between the groups. All numbers indicate ± SEM.