Skip to main content
. 2002 Jun 1;22(11):4302–4311. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-11-04302.2002

Table 1.

Percentage aggregation of Cx- and mock-transfected C6 glioma cells

Percentage of cells in aggregates Percentage of donor cells transferring dye Mean number of receiving cells per donor cell Coupling index
C6-Cx43 72  ± 4 49  ± 4 14  ± 2 7  ± 0.07
C6-Cx40 65  ± 3 55  ± 2 9  ± 1 5  ± 0.2
C6-Cx32 54  ± 3* 89  ± 3 21  ± 3 18  ± 0.1
C6-mock 1 15  ± 4* 13  ± 1.2 1.1  = 0.3 0.14  ± 0.04*
C6-mock 2 13  ± 3* 0.8  ± 0.2 1.1  ± 0.2 0.01  ± 0.005*
C6-mock 3 10  ± 4* 18  ± 1.2 1.2  ± 0.2 0.2  ± 0.1*
C6-WT 18  ± 3* 27  ± 2 3  ± 0.1 0.8  ± 0.2*

Quantitative analysis of short-term aggregation assays. This table lists the percentage of Cx- and mock-transfected C6 cells that form aggregates in suspension assay. Dye transfer assays ofGoldberg et al. (1995) were used as described in Materials and Methods. All assays were performed in a minimum of three independent runs (range, 3–16; mean, 9).

*

, Significantly different from C6-Cx43 cells (p < 0.05). ANOVA for group comparison with post hoc t test is used to establish significant difference between the groups. All numbers indicate ± SEM.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure