Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 12;17(9):e3000280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000280

Table 2. Slope of regression lines with 95% confidence interval for shapes and lines.

The same ranking was applied for the scrambled versions of the stimuli and for their neighboring channels, respectively.

Condition Patient 1 Patient 2
SUA MUA LFP MUA LFP
Shapes 0.0404
(0.0337 to 0.047)
0.049
(0.0448 to 0.0531)
0.1015
(0.0932 to 0.1097)
0.0623
(0.0561 to 0.0685)
0.0892
(0.0834 to 0.095)
Applied ranking for scr_shapes −0.0008*
(−0.0058 to 0.0042)
−0.0026*
(−0.0064 to 0.0011)
−0.0077*
(−0.0129 to −0.0026)
−0.0005*
(−0.0098 to 0.0087)
0.0002*
(−0.0027 to 0.0031)
Applied ranking for neighbors N/A 0.0072*
(0.0043–0.0101)
0.041*
(0.0362–0.0458)
0.0082*
(0.001–0.0153)
0.0285*
(0.026–0.0309)
Lines 0.0443
(0.038 to 0.0507)
0.0468
(0.0431 to 0.0505)
0.0974
(0.0867 to 0.108)
0.0469
(0.0432 to 0.0506)
0.0919
(0.082 to 0.1018)
Applied ranking for scr_lines −0.0009*
(−0.289 to −0.0047)
0.1483*
(−0.0028 to −0.0056)
−0.0059*
(−0.0094 to −0.0024)
0.0073*
(−0.0047 to 0.0194)
−0.0005*
(−0.0043 to 0.0034)
Applied ranking for neighbors N/A −0.0006*
(−0.0057 to 0.0045)
0.0312*
(0.0279 to 0.0346)
0.0007*
(−0.0116 to 0.0256)
0.0305*
(0.0262 to 0.0347)

*Indicates significant ranking difference.

Abbreviations: LFP, local field potential; MUA, multi-unit activity; N/A, not applicable; scr, scrambled; SUA, single-unit activity