Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 23;114:e190120. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760190120

Fig. 2: Bayesian clustering analysis by STRUCTURE of Aedes aegypti. The multilocus genotype of each individual is represented by a bar. Clusters (K) are represented by different colours and the proportion of each colour in the bar represents the probability of assignment (Q) to each cluster. (A) Analysis of 55 American populations (N = 2,224) with eight loci, sorted by locations and countries. (B) Analysis of the 33 populations (N = 1,409) that were assigned to the blue cluster in (A). (C) Analysis of 15 populations (N = 629) that were selected from (B). (D) Analysis of the eight samples (N = 348) genotyped for 13 loci in this study. These samples are framed by the white dashed line in A, B and C. Sample code numbers are: 1- Marabá, BR; 2- Natal, BR; 3- Aracaju, BR; 4- Goiânia, BR; 5- Maceió, BR; 6- Mossoró, BR; 7- Pau dos Ferros, BR; 8- Tucuruí, BR; 9- São Gonçalo, BR; 10- Cachoeiro_2008, BR; 11- Cachoeiro_2012, BR; 12- Jacobina, BR; 13- Rio de Janeiro, BR; 14- São José do Rio Preto, BR; 15- Santos, BR; 16- Rio Branco, BR; 17- Parnaíba, BR; 18- Pacaraima, BR; 19- Montes Claros, BR; 20- Itacoatiara, BR; 21- Foz do Iguaçu, BR; 22- Fortaleza, BR; 23- Castanhal, BR; 24- Boa Vista, BR; 25- Belém, BR; 26- Tocantins, BR; 27- Parnamirim, BR; 28- Macapá_2012, BR; 29- Campo Grande, BR; 30- Nova Iguaçu, BR; 31- Santarém, BR; 32- Puerto Rico, PR; 33- Pance de Cali, CO; 34- Paso de Comercio Cali, CO; 35- Tijuana, MX; 36- Key West, USA; 37- Amacuzac, MX; 38- Costa Rica, CR; 39- Trinidad, TR; 40- Patillas, PR; 41- Carriacou, GR; 42- Dominica, DO; 43- Pijijapan, MX; 44- Coatzacoalcos, MX; 45- Bolivar, CO; 46- Zulia, VN; 47- Houston, Usa; 48- Miami, USA; 49- CAY13, FG; 50- SGO13, FG; 51- CAY14A, FG; 52- SGO14A, FG; 53- CAY14B, FG; 54- SGO14B, FG; 55- MAC14A, BR; 56- OIA14A, BR. Details about the samples 1-48 are described in Kotsakiozi et al. 13 and Monteiro et al. 14 .

Fig. 2: