Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD010463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010463.pub2

Chen 2002.

Methods Randomized phase II trial
Eligible patients
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC

  • Stage IIIB (including patients with malignant pleural effusion) or IV disease

  • Bi‐dimensionally measurable disease

  • No previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy

  • 18 to 80 years of age

  • PS 0 to 2 (WHO scale)

  • Adequate bone marrow function


Exclusion criteria
  • Signs or symptoms of brain metastases

  • Recent myocardial infarction > 3 months before date of diagnosis

  • Unstable angina

  • Inadequate liver function (bilirubin > 1.5 times and ALT/AST > 3 times upper normal limit)

  • Inadequate renal function with creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL

  • Second primary malignancies, except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, excluded from the study

Participants PG arm: 45 ITT population ‐ median age (range): 67 (35 to 80) years/number of elderly participants not reported
CP arm: 45 ITT population ‐ median age (range): 64 (37 to 77) years/number of elderly participants not reported
Interventions PG arm: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3‐hour i.v. infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30‐minute i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks
CP arm: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3‐hour i.v. infusion on day 1 and carboplatin AUC7 (predicted using measured clearances and the Calvert formula) over 1‐hour i.v. infusion on day 1, every 3 weeks
All participants received dexamethasone (10 mg i.v. at –12 and –6 hours), cimetidine (300 mg i.v.), and diphenhydramine (50 mg i.v.) before paclitaxel administration Metoclopramide (40 mg i.v.) given before paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine as antiemetic prophylaxis. Dexamethasone (10 mg i.v.) and metoclopramide (20 mg i.v.) given before gemcitabine treatment (day 8) as antiemetic prophylaxis
Outcomes Primary outcome
  • Cost and time required for each treatment (cost‐effectiveness)


Secondary outcomes
  • Overall survival

  • Time‐to‐disease progression

  • Response rate

  • Toxicity

Notes No information on inclusion of elderly patients nor on specific subgroup analysis, despite multiple attempts to contact study authors
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Eligile participants randomly assigned to paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen or paclitaxel plus gemcitabine regimen by a statistical office not involved in the trial with use of computer‐generated list of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information on allocation concealment analysis
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 OS and 1y OS rate outcome Unclear risk Open‐label study considered to have unclear influence on mortality outcomes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Other outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No evidence of attrition bias
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of reporting bias
Other bias High risk Study designed for general population; elderly subgroup analysis not planned. Neither numbers nor outcomes available for this subgroup