Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;8(16):e011576. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011576

Table 2.

CMR Imaging Results

Variable All Patients (n=1082) MACE (n=73) No MACE (n=1007) P Value
Infarct size (% LV)* 13.3 (5.4–21.7) 20.4 (9.3–28.9) 13.1 (5.3–21.3) 0.001
Microvascular obstruction (% LV)* 0.4 (0–2.0) 1.1 (0–3.2) 0.3 (0–1.9) 0.029
LVEF (%) 50.5 (43.5–57.6) 40.0 (33.0–51.9) 50.9 (44.3–57.6) <0.001
LV end‐diastolic volume, mL 143 (116–171) 145 (122–170) 143 (116–171) 0.820
LV end‐systolic volume, mL 70 (53–91) 86 (61–110) 69 (53–89) 0.001
CURE 0.84 (0.75–0.89) 0.76 (0.67–0.86) 0.84 (0.76–0.89) <0.001
RURE 0.75 (0.67–0.83) 0.69 (0.60–0.79) 0.76 (0.67–0.83) <0.001

Data presented as median (interquartile range). P values were calculated for comparison of patients with and without MACE. CMR indicates cardiac magnetic resonance; CURE, circumferential uniformity ratio estimate; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; % LV, percentage of left ventricular mass; RURE, radial uniformity ratio estimate. Two patients were lost to follow‐up regarding MACE.

*

Late gadolinium enhancement imaging was available for 1055 patients (MACE, n=68; no MACE, n=985).