Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;14(5):632–635. doi: 10.1177/1558944718760033

Table 1.

Bivariate Analysis of Factors Associated With FCR Tendinopathy on MRI (n = 3631).

Variable Total cohort
FCR signal changes
%a P value
(n = 3631) (n = 98)
Age, median (IQR) 45 (33-56) 55 (43-66) <.001
Sex, n (%)
 Men 1787 (49) 49 (50) 2.7 .92
 Women 1844 (51) 49 (50) 2.7
Race, n (%)
 White 2851 (79) 89 (91) 3.1 .02
 African American 188 (5.0) 4 (4.0) 2.1
 Hispanic 156 (4.0) 0 0.0
 Asian 141 (4.0) 2 (2.0) 1.4
 Other/unknown 295 (8.0) 3 (3.0) 1.0
Indication MRI,b n (%)
 Clinical suspected FCR tendinopathy 48 (1.3) 44 (45) 92 .05
 Volar-radial sided wrist pain 123 (3.4) 15 (15) 12 <.001
 Arthritis 184 (5.1) 12 (12) 6.5 .004
 Nerve compression or numbness 62 (1.7) 3 (3,0) 4.8 .23
 Tear or dislocation 393 (11) 14 (14) 3.6 .25
 Non specific pain 743 (20) 24 (25) 3.2 .31
 Other tendinopathies or stiffness 1050 (29) 32 (33) 3.0 .43
 Hand or wrist pain 1819 (50) 50 (51) 2.7 .92
 Mass or swelling 1454 (40) 40 (41) 2.8 .92
 Avascular necrosis 78 (2.1) 2 (2.0) 2.6 .99
 Inflammation 205 (5.6) 5 (5.0) 2.4 .99
 Trauma or fractures 1241 (34) 25 (26) 2.0 .07
 Other 120 (3.3) 2 (2.0) 1.7 .77

Note. Bold indicates significant difference (P value below .05). FCR = flexor carpi radialis; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; IQR = interquartile range.

a

Percentage FCR tendinopathy per variable.

b

Patients can have multiple indications for MRI: 1304 (36%) had 1 indication, 1208 (33%) had 2 indications, 725 (19%) had 3 indications, and 394 (12%) had >4 indications.