Table 6.
Combination between the parameters of the model hypothesized by the SRL vs. ERL Theory: the Utility Model™ (de la Fuente, 2019).
| Combination level | Regulation average/rank | Regulation tendency rank | Academic Emotions | ENG vs. BURN | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR level (range) | RT level (range) | > | < | |||||
| 3 (3.85–5.00) H | 3 (2.84–5.00) H | 3.0 | 5 | High-High: High-Regulation | ++ | – | High ENG | |
| 2 (3.10–3.84) M | 3 (2.84–5.00) H | 2.5 | 4 | Medium-High: Regulation | + | – | M-H ENG | |
| 3 (3.85–5.00) H | 2 (2.35–2.83) M | 2.5 | 4 | High-Medium: Regulation | + | – | M-H ENG | |
| 2 (3.10–3.84) M | 2 (2.35–2.83) M | 2.0 | 3 | Medium: Non-Regulation | + | = | – | M EN/BU |
| 2 (3.10–3.84) M | 1 (1.00–2.34) L | 1.5 | 2 | Medium-Low: Dys-regulation | – | + | M-H BUR | |
| 1 (1.00–3.09) L | 2 (2.35–2.83) M | 1.5 | 2 | Low-Medium: Dys-regulation | – | + | M-H BUR | |
| 1 (1.00–3.09) L | 1 (1.00–2.34) L | 1.0 | 1 | Low-Low: High Dys-regulation | – | – | + | High BUR |
H, high; M, medium; L, low.