Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Aug 13;38(2):394–405. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2865356

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Intermediate results in the deep network. Figure (a)-(h) corresponds to the 16-fold acceleration setting, where (a)-(d) corresponds to iteration 2 and (e)-(h) corresponds to iteration 4. Note that the network at each iteration estimates the alias and noise signals denoted by Nw(xk) from the signal to obtain the denoised image zk=Dw(xk). Figures (i)-(p) corresponds to the super-resolution setting considered in Fig. 4. (i)-(l) corresponds to iteration 1 and (m)-(p) corresponds to iterations 5. At ith iteration, xi−1 is the input and xi is the output. Note that the nature of the noise in both cases is very different. Nevertheless, the same network trained at 10x setting is capable of effectively removing the undersampling artifacts.