Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0222164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222164

Fig 3. SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 discrimination performance.

Fig 3

The SAPS 2 and the SAPS 3 showed acceptable discrimination performances, with an AUROC of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65–0.77) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72–0.82), respectively, although there was no significant difference between both scores. Nevertheless, the SAPS 3 demonstrated superior SMR-based discrimination power compared to the SAPS 2.