Chatard et al. (2006) |
Meritocracy |
Sexism |
Participants in the moderated Meritocracy prime scored higher than participants in the radical Meritocracy prime. |
ds = 0.60 [0.04, 1.16] |
Costa-Lopes et al. (2017) [study 1] |
Meritocracy |
Implicit attitudes |
Participants in the Meritocracy prime scored higher than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.61 [ −0.03, 1.24] |
Costa-Lopes et al. (2017) [study 2] |
Meritocracy |
Implicit attitudes |
Individuals' level of implicit prejudice at Time 2 increased in the Meritocracy prime, but not in the control group. |
dz
Meritocracy = 0.55dz
control = −0.02 |
Katz and Hass (1988) |
PWE |
Pro-black attitudes |
Participants in the PWE prime score lower than participants in the Egalitarianism prime. |
ds = −0.52 [ −1.16, 0.12] |
|
|
Anti-black attitudes |
Participants in the PWE prime score higher than participants in the Egalitarianism prime. |
ds = 0.76 [0.11, 1.42] |
Ho et al. (2002) [study 1] |
Meritocracy + Economic success |
Negative stereotypes toward blacks |
Participants in the prime condition score higher than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.40 [0.00, 0.80] |
|
|
Perceived racial discrimination |
Participants in the prime condition do not perceive significantly less racial discrimination than participants in the control condition. |
Not estimable |
Ho et al. (2002) [study 2] |
Intergroup comparison of Perceived Success |
Negative Stereotypes toward Mexicans |
Participants in the prime condition score higher than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.75 [0.12, 1.38] |
|
|
Internal Attributions for the low status position |
Participants in the prime condition score higher than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.68 [0.05, 1.30] |
|
|
Attributions of lower status position |
Participants in the prime condition score higher than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.64 [0.02, 1.26] |
|
|
Perceived racial discrimination |
Participants in the prime condition do not perceive significantly less racial discrimination than participants in the control condition. |
Not estimable |
Pereira et al. (2009) |
Meritocracy |
Discrimination: opposition to Turkish Adhesion to EU |
Participants in the Meritocracy prime show a higher opposition than participants in the control condition. |
ds = 0.39 [−0.23, 1.02] |