Bayliff 1999.
Methods | RCT, parallel design | |
Participants |
Total number of randomized participants: 99 Inclusion criteria: > 18 years of age, undergoing major thoracic operations (pneumectomy, lobectomy, oesophagectomy) Exclusion criteria: history of asthma, congestive heart failure, ≥ 2nd‐degree heart block, history of SVTs, or were receiving any of the following drugs: digoxin, oral beta‐blocker, quinidine, procainamide, amiodarone, diltiazem, verapamil Type of surgery: major thoracic operations (pneumectomy, lobectomy, oesophagectomy) Baseline characteristics Intervention group (propranolol)
Control group
Country: Canada Setting: hospital, single centre |
|
Interventions |
Intervention group (propranolol)
Control group (placebo)
|
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes measured/reported by study authors: arrhythmias requiring treatment (until 3 days following surgery, detected by Holter ECG); overall arrhythmia rate, myocardial ischaemia, mortality, bradycardia, hypotension (SBP < 100 mmHg), length of hospital stay, congestive heart failure, bronchospasm Outcomes relevant to the review: mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, AF, bradycardia (HR ≤ 60 bpm), hypotension, congestive heart failure, length of hospital stay (see notes below), |
|
Notes |
Funding/declarations of interest: grant from Victoria Hospital Research Foundation and the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists Research Foundation Study dates: February 1994‐October 1995 Note:
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomization in blocks of 4, exact method of sequence generation unclear |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sealed envelopes. No additional details |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | We assumed from the information in the study report that all participants and personnel were blinded to the intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessors (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not specified |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | See below |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study authors did not report prospective clinical trial registration or publication of a protocol. It was not feasible to effectively assess risk of reporting bias |
Other bias | Low risk | Not detected |