Horikoshi 2017.
Methods | RCT, parallel design | |
Participants |
Total number of randomized participants: 40 Inclusion criteria: ASA I or II; scheduled to undergo oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer Exclusion criteria: people with cardiac disease (e.g. arrhythmias including AF, conduction abnormalities, antiarrhthymic medications including beta‐blockers, recent angina pectoris, and MI); pulmonary or renal disease; thyroid dysfunction Type of surgery: elective oesophagectomy Baseline characteristics Intervention group (landiolol)
Control group (placebo)
Country: Japan Setting: single centre; university hospital |
|
Interventions |
Intervention group (landiolol)
Control group (placebo)
|
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes measured/reported by study authors: AF (reported after surgery, on 1st postoperative day, and 2nd postoperative day), sinus tachycardia; haemodynamic variables; plasma cytokines concentration in blood; bradycardia (not defined); hypotension (not defined); heart failure; cardiogenic shock; length of hospital stay Outcomes relevant to the review: AF (2nd postoperative day), hypotension; bradycardia; length of hospital stay; congestive heart failure |
|
Notes |
Funding/declarations of interest: no external funding sources, and study authors declare no conflicts Study dates: April 2012‐January 2015 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Use of computer‐generated random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | See above |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Anaesthesiologists and surgeons were blinded to group assignment |
Blinding of outcome assessors (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not specfied |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Loss of participant, ITT analysis not used |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Retrospective clinical trial registration (UMIN000020238). Not feasible to assess risk of reporting bias from these documents |
Other bias | Low risk | Not detected |