Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;35(19):3576–3583. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz161

Table 3.

Significant and novel genes identified by both SPU(1) and SPU(2) with the ‘E + G + Methyl’ approach, but not by the STD, ‘E + G,’ and TWAS based on the SCZ2 data

Gene CHR No. mQTL No. CpG SPU(1) SPU(2) References
Source: Hippo
CHRM3 1 2 2 2.7×107 2.5×107
KCNS3 2 12 4 9.8×101 3.3×107 [1]
EFR3B 2 3 1 5.6×107 5.2×107 [1]
CHL1 3 1340 191 9.5×101 1.8×109
PSMG4 6 248 24 4.0×104 0.0×100
FAM20C 7 1579 339 5.8×101 0.0×100
C7orf50 7 805 135 1.1×101 8.8×109
DRD4 11 109 39 6.3×103 7.7×107
TOLLIP 11 559 68 4.4×101 9.1×1010
LRP6 12 163 32 3.5×104 1.6×1013
FAM177A1 14 9 2 2.3×106 8.9×107
MADCAM1 19 404 85 3.0×104 3.4×106
CSNK1G2 19 68 17 3.1×108 4.7×109
Source:MCF7
PRADC1 2 2 1 4.6×106 4.7×106
CREB1 2 3 1 1.0×106 7.6×107 [1]
ZNF623 8 13 3 1.2×105 3.1×106

Note: ‘sig SNP’ gives the P-value of the most significant SNP within a ± 500 kb extension for each gene in the SCZ2 data; the previously reported gene-SCZ associations appear in ‘References’: [1] Goes et al. (2015).