Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 8;26(4):669–681. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1618750

Table 7.

Logistic regression models for the association between attractiveness and the odds of conviction, incarceration and probation for males.

  Odds of conviction
(N = 1550)
Odds of conviction
(N = 1550)
Odds of probation
(N = 758)
Odds of incarceration
(N = 758)
Coeff OR Coeff OR Coeff OR Coeff OR
Predictor variables                
 Attractiveness −.150 0.860 −.082 0.922 −.294 0.745 −.244 0.783
(.093) (.103) (.130) (.134)
 Number of arrests .168 1.183*
    (.025)        
Controls                
 Age −.006 0.994 −.008 0.992 −.044 0.957 .038 1.039
(.030) (.031) (.047) (.050)
 Race −.234 0.791* −.256 0.774* .139 1.150 .369 1.446*
(.087) (.087) (.205) (.258)
 SES .192 1.212 .131 1.140 −.155 0.856 .745 2.106*
(.210) (.204) (.220) (.630)

Note. OR = odds ratio; coeff = coefficient; SES = socioeconomic status.

Standard errors in parentheses.

*p < .05.