Table 3.
b | Lower CI | Upper CI | seb | t | p | β | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 | F (3, 37) = 16.02, p < .001, adj. R2 = .53 (n = 40) | ||||||
Case complexity | .01 | .09 | .11 | .05 | 0.82 | .82 | .03 |
Relevant evidence | .05 | −.04 | .14 | .04 | 1.18 | .24 | .13 |
Jury comprehension | .25 | .16 | .33 | .04 | 6.12 | <.001 | .71 |
Step 2 | F (4, 25) = 6.46, p = .001, adj. R2 = .43 (n = 29) | ||||||
Case complexity | .04 | −.08 | .16 | .06 | 0.67 | .51 | .10 |
Relevant evidence | .02 | −.11 | .14 | .06 | 0.28 | .78 | .04 |
Jury comprehension | .22 | .09 | .35 | .06 | 3.49 | .002 | .61 |
Trial outcome | −.25 | −.76 | .25 | .25 | −1.03 | .31 | −.17 |
Note: For trial outcome, 1 = defendant won case.