Table 4.

Defendant satisfaction regressed on trial process perceptions and outcome.

	b	Lower CI	Upper CI	seb	t	p	β
Step 1	F (3, 47) = 41.09, p < .001, adj. R2 = .71 (n = 50)
Case complexity	−.03	−.11	.05	.04	−0.70	.49	−.06
Relevant evidence	−.03	−.11	.05	.04	−0.70	.49	−.06
Jury comprehension	.33	.26	.39	.03	9.95	<.001	.84
Step 2	F (4, 37) = 27.48, p < .001, adj. R2 = .72 (n = 41)
Case complexity	−.06	−.16	.04	.05	−1.30	.20	−.12
Relevant evidence	−.04	−.12	.04	.04	−1.07	.29	−.09
Jury comprehension	.27	.18	.35	.04	6.51	<.001	.71
Trial outcome	.34	.01	.68	.16	2.10	.04	.20

Note: For trial outcome, 1 = defendant won case.