Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb 15;21(4):1247–1256. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01247.2001

Table 3.

Comparison of intrinsic and synaptic properties of sensory neurons expressing EGFP or various EGFP-PKC constructs

Apl I-m Apl I-w Apl II-m Apl II-w Apl I-C2 Apl II-C2 EGFP ANOVA
Ihold(pA) −0.08  ± 0.03 −0.15  ± 0.03** −0.20  ± 0.10 −0.08  ± 0.03 −0.11  ± 0.03 −0.03  ± 0.01 −0.05  ± 0.01 *
Rin(MΩ) 111.7  ± 15.7 136.4  ± 23.4 92.8  ± 7.8 109.5  ± 7.8 133.8  ± 14.8 140.8  ± 11.8* 107.1  ± 10.8 NS
Vr(mV) −29.8  ± 4.0 −31.4  ± 1.7 −35.0  ± 2.3 −32.3  ± 1.8 −36.3  ± 0.9* −34.6  ± 1.5 −31.4  ± 1.9 NS
Initial EPSP (mV) 3.8  ± 1.1 4.6  ± 2.1 3.0  ± 0.9* 13.9  ± 5.1 9.3  ± 3.5 6.9  ± 2.2 7.5  ± 2.3 NS
EPSPs 6–10 (% of initial) 33  ± 3.8 23  ± 5.3 32  ± 5.0 26  ± 3.5 40  ± 8.4 40  ± 9.0 35  ± 5.6 NS
EPSPs 36–40 (% of initial) 7.9  ± 2.2 4.5  ± 1.2 6.5  ± 2.2 10.1  ± 2.4 11.3  ± 3.3 12.5  ± 4.2 7.7  ± 2.9 NS

The holding current (Ihold) is the current needed to hold the SN at −50 mV before the first stimulus. Resting potential (Vr) and input resistance (Rin) were taken at the end of each experiment. The values for Vr are therefore underestimated, because at this point, 5-HT was present in the bathing solution and the SNs were often spontaneously active when hyperpolarization was removed. EPSPs 6–10, Early depression; EPSPs 36–40, late depression; ANOVA, one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between individual groups and the control EGFP group are indicated by asterisks (**p< 0.01, *p < 0.05; unpaired one-tailed ttest with Welch's correction).