Skip to main content
. 2001 Aug 1;21(15):5730–5739. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05730.2001

Table 1.

Latencies, durations, and magnitudes of reward responses in the two behavioral situations

Behavioral situation N Latency (msec) Duration (msec) Magnitude (% decrease)
Instrumental task condition
 Immediate 35 171  ± 83 160  ± 74 50  ± 17
 Fixed delay 40 188  ± 68 143  ± 74 55  ± 16
 Variable delay 23 193  ± 59 126  ± 86 53  ± 20
Free reward condition
 Irregular 92 169  ± 42 147  ± 56 63  ± 18
 Regular 4 sec 89 179  ± 37 143  ± 57 60  ± 16
 Regular 2 sec 70 175  ± 51 143  ± 64 53  ± 16

Values are means ± SD. N, numbers of TANs. Magnitudes are indicated as decreases in percentage below baseline activity during the control period (see Materials and Methods). For quantitative analysis, some recorded neurons were discarded if noise artifact caused by jerky movements by the monkeys contaminated the data, thus explaining the lower number of neurons used for the response parameters analysis, compared with the size of the samples of responding neurons.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure