Table 2.
Dependency of success rate on aSF and dSF and their interaction
| Session | aSF | dSF | aSF * dSF |
|---|---|---|---|
| All | +++ | +++ | + |
| 24 | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 48 | − | +++ | − |
| HT 24 | + | +++ | + |
| HT 48 | − | +++ | − |
| ST 24 | +++ | +++ | + |
| ST 48 | − | +++ | − |
| HT 24 normal | + | +++ | − |
| HT 24 glove | − | ++ | + |
| HT 24 vertical | − | + | − |
| ST 24 normal | + | +++ | − |
| ST 24 glove | +++ | +++ | − |
| ST 24 vertical | − | +++ | − |
| HT 48 normal | − | + | − |
| HT 48 glove | − | +++ | − |
| HT 48 vertical | − | − | − |
| ST 48 normal | − | +++ | − |
| ST 48 glove | − | − | − |
| ST 48 vertical | − | − | − |
Results of univariate ANOVA tests for the different categories are presented. aSF = (SFr +SFI)/2; dSF = log1.09(SFR) − log1.09(SFI), where r andl indicate right and left hands, respectively. −,P > 0.05; +, P < 0.05; ++, P < 0.01; +++,P < 0.001.