Schematic overview of the possible interaction pathways of an
antimicrobial peptide with a lipid bilayer. Possible thermodynamic states
(either stable or metastable) are indicated by black labels, the major kinetic
pathways connecting them by gray arrows and red labels. Short black arrows
represent additional inter-conversion pathways. Outside the target membrane,
peptide monomers and small aggregates exist in equilibrium. At the target
membrane, the peptides bind to the interface (Adsorption). At the interface an
equilibrium may exist between monomeric and polymeric aggregation states. For a
symmetric bilayer, the asymmetric membrane bound state is not thermodynamically
stable. Eventually the peptides will distribute equally between the two
monolayer leaflets. This can occur via two alternative translocation pathways.
In the non-leaky variant the peptides are able to cross the bilayer without the
formation of a pore. In some cases, the intermediate transmembrane state is
thermodynamically stable (e.g. hydrophobic peptides which adopt a transmembrane
orientation). The key feature of many antimicrobial peptides is that they
permeabilize the membrane following a leaky translocation pathway. Above a
certain peptide– lipid ratio, the peptides insert into the bilayer to
form a porated lamellar phase (Poration). A variety of different pore structures
may be formed, including the barrel-stave, the toroidal and the disordered
toroidal state. These separate states should be interpreted as extreme cases
with mixed varieties of these models, and conversion between alternative states
is likely to occur. The porated states can be stable themselves, but they can
also be transient structures in the translocation pathway. In that case, once
enough peptides are adsorbed at the opposing monolayer leaflet, the pores seal.
On the other hand, increased accumulation of certain peptides may lead to a
detergent-like disintegration of the membrane resulting in formation of
non-lamellar, e.g. micellar, systems (solubilization pathway). Note that the
secondary structure of the peptides could vary along the various pathways. The
helical or random configurations drawn here are merely illustrative of these
processes and should not be taken literally. Figure legend and image taken from
reference 13891389.