Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Rev. 2018 Jul 27;118(16):7409–7531. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678

Table 2.

Disruption buffers used in papers compiled in this review. Note that some papers use multiple buffers so percentages may not add to 100%. Not specified is likely to be room cell media or Na-rich buffer by default.

MODE OF MEMBRANE DISRUPTION: Cell media Na-rich “physiological” buffer K-rich “intracellular” buffer Buffered sugar solution Not specified / other
ALL 37% (n=110) 34% (n=101) 9% (n=27) 17% (n=52) 12% (n=35)
Electroporation 28% (n=47) 31% (n=52) 7% (n=12) 25% (n=42) 17% (n=28)
Physical (non-electroporation) 58% (n=49) 32% (n=27) 7% (n=6) 5% (n=4) 7% (n=6)
Biochemical 28% (n=13) 43% (n=20) 22% (n=10) 15% (n=7) 0% (n=0)