Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 26;10:4378. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12365-5

Table 1.

Thermodynamic and kinetic data of folding of L6-NTD compared to WT-NTD

WT-NTDa L6-NTD
mD-NCD (kcal mol−1 M−1) 1.69 ± 0.03 1.30 ± 0.05
mD-NF (kcal mol−1 M−1) 1.69 ± 0.02 1.37 ± 0.03
[urea]50%CD (M) 3.30 ± 0.01 5.99 ± 0.02
[urea]50%F (M) 3.31 ± 0.01 5.95 ± 0.01
ΔGD-NCD (kcal mol−1) 5.6 ± 0.1 7.8 ± 0.3
ΔGD-NF (kcal mol−1) 5.6 ± 0.1 8.2 ± 0.2
kf (s−1) 13,000 ± 6000 519,000 ± 213,000
ku (s−1) 3 ± 1 0.2 ± 0.1
mf (kcal mol−1 M−1) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.13 ± 0.05
mu (kcal mol−1 M−1) 0.23 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.04
β T 0.84 ± 0.02 0.79 ± 0.09

βT denotes the Tanford β-value, calculated from mf and mu (ref. 17). Errors of βT are propagated s.e. from regression analysis

aEquilibrium thermodynamic quantities are from ref. 17; kinetic quantities are from ref. 11. Errors are s.e. from regression analysis