Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 10;15(5):1288–1293. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.87131

Table I.

The accuracy analysis of the two pathology classification systems in these patients

Parameter Csendes classification with 95% CI Nagakawa classification with 95% CI P-value
Sensitivity 0.97 (0.9478–0.9922) 0.99 (0.9678–1.0000) > 0.05
Specificity 0.79 (0.6984–0.8816) 1.00 (1.0000– 1.0000) > 0.05
Accuracy 0.92 (0.8590–0.9810) 0.99 (0.9678–1.0000) > 0.05
Missed diagnosis rate 0.03 (0.0000–0.0684) 0.01 (0.0000–0.0324) > 0.05
Misdiagnosis rate 0.21 (0.1184–0.3016) 0.00 (0.0000–0.0000) > 0.05
Positive predictive value 0.93 (0.8726–0.9874) 1.00 (1.0000–1.0000) < 0.05
Negative predictive value 0.88 (0.8069–0.9531) 0.67 (0.5643–0.7757) > 0.05
Positive likelihood ratio 4.58 (3.1422–6.7899) ∞ (∞–∞) < 0.05
Negative likelihood ratio 0.04 (0.0095–0.1516) 0.01 (0.0014–0.0703) > 0.05
Total 95% CI 0.5000 0.3756–0.5080 > 0.05