Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 20;10:972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00972

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Design scheme of KCa2.2 selective activators and Rosetta models of the top 10 binding poses with the lowest energy of template compounds in the interface between CaM (pink) and the CaM-BD (light green) of KCa3.1 and KCa2.2. The docking model of SKA-74 (A) and SKA-76 (B) showed that the ten lowest binding energy scored models exhibit good structural convergence in KCa2.2 but not in KCa3.1 suggesting selectivity for KCa2.2 over KCa3.1.