Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Bisex. 2019 Jan 9;18(4):478–496. doi: 10.1080/15299716.2018.1481482

Table 3.

Differences between Sexual Coercion Experiences on Binegativity, Alcohol Use, and Drinking to Cope Motives

Yes sexual coercion n = 107 (48.0%) No sexual coercion n = 116 (52.0%) t df p

M (SD) M (SD)
Alcohol frequency 13.44 (7.89) 10.11 (6.75) −3.37 209.41 .001**
Alcohol quantity 3. 64 (1.78) 3.76 (2.22) −0.41 221 .679
Drinking to cope motives 13.66 (6.52) 11.41 (5.76) −2.72 212.20 .007**
Binegativity 52.80 (23.84) 43.78 (19.21) −3.10 203.67 .002*
*

p < .01;

**

p < .001.