Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 20;10:2126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02126

Table 2.

Checklist for quality assessment.

1) The use of standardized executive tasks*. 0 = No standardized tasks;
1 = Use of some non-standardized tasks;
2 = Use of all standardized tasks.
2) Controlling of psychological (e.g. depression, anxiety, emotional dysregulation) and/or physiological variables (e.g. blood values, hormonal and inflammatory aspects). 0 = No control of variables;
1 = Control of psychological or physiological variables;
2 = Control of both psychological and physiological variables.
3) The use of international guidelines for BMI classification. 0 = No international guidelines;
1 = Shared guidelines (i.e. CDC);
2 = International guidelines.
4) Quality of the method description (about executive variables). 0 = Procedures and assessment tools are not well indicated;
1 = Procedures and assessment tools are partially described;
2 = Procedure and assessment tools are well described.
5) Quality of results description (about executive variables). 0 = Executive functioning is not included in the results;
1 = Executive functioning is partially included in the results;
2 = Executive functioning is included in the results.
6) Quality of discussion and conclusion (about executive variables). 0 = Executive functioning is not included in either discussion or conclusion;
1 = Executive functioning is not well included in discussion and conclusion;
2 = Executive functioning is included in both discussion and conclusion.
*

Behavioral tasks widely used in literature for the analysis of a specific executive function.